Problem-solving Discussion is an effort on the part of a
small group to reach a solution to a problem through informal interchange of
facts, inferences, and judgments. This method of discussion seeks consensus
rather than majority rule. The focus of this event should be the encouragement
of cooperation and critical thinking to arrive at the collective goal of better
understanding and problem solving.
Rules – Topic
Selection
The
topic(s) for Discussion shall be approved each year by the Board of
Directors.
The
MSHSL Associate Director working with the Discussion Facilitator, shall
provide a study outline and bibliography of the main topic(s) and related
sub-topics.
Tasks
for MSHSL-sponsored contests will be furnished by the League (as are
cuttings and questions for the various draw categories) and will not
mandate any specific agenda.
(Invitational
festival managers should create tasks for their festivals.)
Rules - Group
The
Discussion group shall be composed of not more than eight contestants.
Additional
sections may be scheduled if the number of contestants exceeds eight.
The
discussion will be task-oriented where participants act as members of a
group whose goal is most frequently an agreed-upon statement of policy,
rules, lists, etc., which may also include rationale.
The
discussants should control their own process of inquiry.
Emerging
leadership from within the group should develop.
Management
of time for that round should remain the responsibility of the discussants
themselves.
THE
DISCUSSION PERIOD SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE HOUR (60 MINUTES).
Rules – What you’re
judged on
The
basis for judging Discussion should place emphasis on the task and social
dimensions of group interaction.
Did
the discussant's contributions add to the group effort?
Did
the discussant possess sufficient information, and was the information of
high quality?
Did
the discussant's contributions reflect an understanding of major issues?
Did
the discussant's behavior reflect a respect for the dignity and worth of
other participants?
Did
the discussant exhibit active listening skills?
Judges
are not to participate.
At no
time should a Judge become a part of the discussion.
Judges
should not suggest an agenda, give an opinion, or give oral critiques.